Context: India’s agriculture is increasingly being carried by women, but nearly half of them work as unpaid family workers, exposing a serious mismatch between “Feminisation of Agriculture” and real economic empowerment; this is why tools like the Women’s Economic Empowerment (WEE) / Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) are crucial for measuring inclusive growth when India’s FLFPR has stayed around or below 35% for decades.
For UPSC, this is a classic GS I (women) + GS III (inclusive growth) + Essay topic that combines data, constitution, schemes, gender budgeting, and rural distress.
Definitions and Core Concepts
Definition: The “Feminization of Agriculture” refers to the increasing percentage of female workers in the agricultural sector relative to men. This is primarily driven by male out-migration (men moving to cities for industry/service jobs) and the “push” factor of agrarian distress, leaving women to manage farm work.
The “Paradox” of Participation: While Female Labor Force Participation Rate (FLFPR) in agriculture has risen (recent PLFS data puts overall female FLFPR at 41.7% in 2023-24, with a massive chunk in agriculture), the quality of work has deteriorated.
- 71% of the female workforce is engaged in agriculture (compared to only 47% of men).
- Wage Gap: Women earn approx. 20-30% less than men for the same tasks.
- “De-facto” vs. “De-jure”: Women are de-facto (in practice) farmers but not de-jure (by law) owners of land.
Women’s Economic Empowerment Index (WEAI): A tool highlighted for inclusive growth, WEAI measures empowerment across five domains:
- Production: Decision-making power about farming.
- Resources: Ownership/access to productive assets (land, livestock, credit).
- Income: Control over the use of income.
- Leadership: Participation in economic groups (like FPOs/SHGs).
- Time: Workload balance (productive vs. domestic/care work).
Constitutional, Legal & Institutional Framework
| Constitution Article / Acts | Relevance for Women Farmers |
| Art 14 & 15(3) | Equality before law; State can make special provisions for women (basis for schemes like MKSP). |
| Art 39(a) & 39(d) | Right to adequate livelihood; Equal pay for equal work (DPSP). |
| Art 42 | Just and humane conditions of work; Maternity relief. |
| Art 243D (3) | 33% reservation in Panchayats (critical for rural decision-making). |
| Hindu Succession Amendment Act (2005) | Grants daughters equal coparcenary rights in ancestral property (crucial for land titles). |
| Forest Rights Act (2006) | Mandates joint titling of land rights for spouses in forest-dwelling communities. |
Case Studies: Stories of Resilience & Reform
Case Study 1: The Collective Power – Kudumbashree (Kerala)
- Context: Kerala faced a decline in agricultural production and high female unemployment.
- Intervention: The “Sangha Krishi” (Group Farming) model. Women formed Joint Liability Groups (JLGs) to lease fallow land collectively.
- Impact: Over 68,000 JLGs farm nearly 50,000 hectares. Because they farm as a legal group, they can access bank credit (which individuals without land titles cannot).
- Lesson: Collectivization bypasses the lack of individual land ownership.
Case Study 2: Digital Empowerment – Swayam Sampurna FPO (Odisha)
- Context: Women in Mayurbhanj district practiced subsistence farming with low yields.
- Intervention: Formation of an all-women Farmer Producer Organization (FPO) integrated with technology (e.g., Digital Green). They used “Community Resource Persons” (CRPs) equipped with smartphones to disseminate video advisories on organic fertilizers and crop planning.
- Impact: Improved bargaining power, transition to high-value crops (like watermelon/tomato), and direct market linkage bypassing middlemen.
- Lesson: Digital Literacy combined with FPOs creates “Smart Farmers.”
Case Study 3: Western UP – Valuation of female family labour
- A study in Muzaffarnagar and Baghpat found that women contributed roughly one‑fifth of agricultural income and over three‑fifths of animal husbandry income, yet this contribution was neither fully recognised nor remunerated, underlining the scale of invisible labour.
Government Initiatives & Policies (Domestic)
- Mahila Kisan Sashaktikaran Pariyojana (MKSP): A sub-component of NRLM specifically focused on “women farmers.” It promotes sustainable agriculture and reduces drudgery.
- Custom Hiring Centers (CHCs): Subsidies are provided to women SHGs to buy farm machinery, addressing the issue that most tools are designed for men (physically difficult for women to operate).
- Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): Special subsidies for women entrepreneurs in agri-processing.
- 10,000 FPOs Scheme: The operational guidelines mandate minimum one woman director in the Board of Directors of new FPOs to ensure female voice in governance
International Landscape & Comparative Models
The Bangladesh Model (Micro-Credit + Ag-Extension):
- Model: Bangladesh integrated micro-credit (Grameen Bank style) specifically with agricultural extension services for women.
- Success: It proved that giving women control over agricultural income (not just labor) leads to better child nutrition and education outcomes compared to when men control the income.
- Lesson for India: Credit alone is not enough; it must be paired with technical training (extension services) to be productive
Issues, Challenges & Gaps (Prioritized for UPSC Mains)
- The Land Title Trap: Only ~13-14% of Indian women own operational landholdings. Without land titles, they are ineligible for formal credit (Kisan Credit Cards), insurance (PMFBY), and fertilizer subsidies.
- “Feminization of Agrarian Distress”: Women are often left with the most labor-intensive, low-paying tasks (weeding, transplanting) while men operate machines.
- Technological Exclusion: Farm machinery (tractors, tillers) is engineered for male bodies (ergonomics). Women lack training in modern “climate-smart” practices.
- Unpaid Family Labor: A significant portion of the rising FLFPR is “unpaid family helpers,” meaning their labor subsidizes the family farm but earns them no independent income.
- Lack of Institutional Voice: Despite 33% reservation in Panchayats, “Sarpanch Patis” (husbands acting on behalf of wives) often control agricultural committees.
- Credit Bias: Bankers often view women as “high risk” borrowers for agricultural loans without male guarantors
Stakeholders and their roles
- Women farmers and workers: Need to organise into cooperatives, FPOs and SHGs, demand joint titles, and build bargaining power in land, labour and product markets.
- Households and communities: Must shift from viewing women as “helpers” to co‑farmers, recognise their work, support daughters’ inheritance, mobility and education.
- State and central governments: Responsible for land law reforms, gender‑responsive budgeting, tailored extension, and targeted schemes that directly reach women producers.
- Financial institutions and markets: Banks, MFIs, and input/output firms need to design products accessible to women—collateral‑light credit, women‑friendly market yards, digital payment systems.
- Civil society and collectives: NGOs, FPO federations and women’s organisations can catalyse collectivisation, legal literacy, and capacity building for climate‑smart agriculture and value addition.
- International agencies and research bodies: FAO, IFPRI and academic institutions contribute indices like WEAI, data, and best‑practice models that can inform Indian policy reforms.
Way Forward: Visionary Recommendations
- Legal Reform (Joint Titling): Mandate that all new government land transfers or housing schemes (like PMAY) must have joint registration (husband & wife).
- “Uberization” of Farm Machinery: Create women-run Custom Hiring Centers that rent out gender-friendly tools (lighter, adjustable weeders/sprayers).
- Redefine “Farmer”: The legal definition of a “farmer” in state acts must be delinked from land ownership to include “cultivators” so they can access benefits.
- Agri-Nutrition Corridor: Leverage women’s role to promote bio-fortified crops (millets), linking their produce directly to Anganwadis (Poshan Abhiyaan), creating a guaranteed market.
- Data Visibility: Adopt the WEAI officially in the Agriculture Census to track empowerment, not just participation.
Prelims Revision Facts (Crisp List)
- FAO Status: FAO estimates that if women had the same access to productive resources as men, farm yields could increase by 20-30%.
- 15th Oct: Celebrated as Rashtriya Mahila Kisan Diwas.
- Article 14: Equality before Law.
- Article 39(d): Equal pay for equal work.
- MKSP: Sub-scheme of Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-NRLM.
- Likely Trap: “Feminization of Agriculture means women act as the owners of the land.” -> Incorrect. It refers to labor participation, not ownership.
Mains Question Bank
GS I: “Discuss the phenomenon of ‘feminization of agriculture’ in India. Does it signify empowerment or distress? Analyze with suitable examples.”
Mentor’s Note: This question demands a balanced sociological and economic analysis. Do not just define the term; you must critically evaluate whether this trend is a sign of progress (women taking charge) or a symptom of rural distress (men leaving low-paying farm jobs).
GS III: “Inclusive growth in agriculture is impossible without acknowledging the ‘invisible woman farmer’. Discuss the structural bottlenecks they face and suggest policy measures to bridge the gender gap.”
Mentor’s Note: This is a core Economy question. Focus on ‘Structural Bottlenecks’ (institutional barriers) and ‘Policy Measures’ (schemes). Use specific scheme names mentioned in the sources.
Mains Answer writing approach tips
- Introduction: Use one current data point (e.g., women as over 40% of agri workforce, FLFPR below 35%, or 2026 – International Year of the Woman Farmer).
- Body: Structure around (a) status and data, (b) paradox of feminisation without empowerment (unpaid work, landlessness), (c) constitutional–policy framework, (d) case studies and reforms.
- Use indices: Mention FLFPR, WEAI, Global Gender Gap metrics and link them to inclusive growth and SDGs (especially SDG 5 and SDG 2).
